The given discussions suggest reliability in the study and reflect on its importance within academic investigations. Reliability is an essential criterion that allows assuming the study is trustworthy and relevant. Validity is another concept suitable for scientific papers, determining whether the work is accurate and its findings are precise. It is crucial to examine the two posts to reflect on the discussed topic of reliability.
This discussion post mentions significant reliability criteria in scientific works, including stability, equivalence, and homogeneity. These notions are vital for scientific studies; they show whether the article uses pertinent information and provides accurate conclusions. Moreover, the post discusses validity as construction that focuses on precise evaluation. Scientists have multiple methods to evaluate the trustworthiness of the provided material, including testing tools and specific instruments (Urban et al., 2022). Therefore, these devices make it possible to assess the reliability of provided information within any article.
The second discussion post explores the consistency of measurement methods in determining reliability. Indeed, it is vital because the chosen strategies sometimes mismatch with the agenda of the study and can distort results. Furthermore, some instruments can falsify outcomes and show opposite conclusions while measuring experimentally rather than theoretically (Arevalo-Rodriguez et al., 2020). Thus, it is crucial to choose tools that will comply with the purposes and aims of the investigation to receive detailed and factual findings.
Overall, reliability is necessary for academic writings as scientific investigations are assumed to be exact and applicable. It is seen that the choice of evaluation method is vital because some tools might misinterpret results, and findings will not be accurate. Moreover, many criteria to measure the reliability of the information exist, and it simplifies finding relevant articles. Therefore, reliability is vital to provide an evident database for scientific explorations.
References
Arevalo-Rodriguez, I., Buitrago-Garcia, D., Simancas-Racines, D., Zambrano-Achig, P., del Campo, R., Ciapponi, A., Sued, O., Martinez-GarcĂa, L., Rutjes, A. W., Low, N., Bossuyt, P. M., Perez-Molina, J. A., & Zamora, J. (2020). False-negative results of initial RT-PCR assays for COVID-19: A systematic review. PLOS ONE, 15(12), 2–8. Web.
Urban, R. W., Jennings, L. A., & Cipher, D. J. (2022). Relationships among resilience, stress, and persistence in prenursing students during COVID-19. Nurse Educator, Publish Ahead of Print, 102–107. Web.