Justification of the Article
The article considered above is an analytical study, affecting the relationship between the patient’s demographic characteristics and the course of treatment. Although the material itself addresses directly heart failure described by Regalbuto et al., the approach can be applied in any medical practice. The main idea of this study and the central conclusion from it is the fact that despite the availability of detailed instructions, patients are not always able to understand them correctly (Regalbuto et al., 2014). Limitations to this may be a language barrier or a simple lack of knowledge and education in one area or another.
Following this, I would recommend that doctors and nurses treat patients more carefully and take into account not only medical but also social and demographic factors. Medical specialists must ensure the patient’s recovery, but this cannot be done by merely prescribing drugs. It is necessary that the patient fully understands the entire course of treatment. To do this, doctors and other professionals need to make sure that the proposed instructions are clear to the patient.
Summary of Analysis
The approach to the selection and analysis of peer-reviewed studies is a technique that is necessary primarily for the successful writing of a variety of articles. However, it can also be used for self-education and obtaining new information related to professional activities. First of all, it is necessary to decide for what purpose a search for peer-reviewed research is carried out. These articles can be divided into two categories: quantitative and qualitative research.
While the former provides clear statistics and is full of specific numbers, reports from the latter category are aimed at exploring and describing a variety of concepts (Smith, 2009). However, for whatever topic research would not be necessary, in any case, it is essential to pay attention to the relevance of the study to a given theme. It is also required to pay attention to how well the sources confirm the conclusions, and whether both the strengths and weaknesses of the study were taken into account.
Following this, it is necessary to identify and highlight the strategies for the information and the articles. First of all, the search for the topic that interests the researcher must be narrowed. The report should address any specific issue that is in the reader’s field of interest (Vassallo, 2018). This means that information needs to be searched not across the Internet, but through strictly delineated search resources, eliminating all the unnecessary topics and articles using various tools, such as date and keywords.
As a second strategy, which helps to find reliable and high-quality information, I suggest using materials only from trusted sources and with the most visits or citations. When searching for an article, one should first turn to well-known magazines, sites, and organizations that post only verified information. Often, these are a variety of paid resources, which with their limited access, confirm the lack of low-quality content.
As mentioned above, to search for a high-quality article, it is necessary to use the appropriate resources developed specifically for this task. The first such resource is Google Scholar, an offspring of the renowned search engine designed specifically to search for academic articles. Its advantages are the ability to specify the required date, as well as access to many citation styles. However, for professional activities, the CINHAL & MEDLINE combined search database seems much more useful to me. This database has several significant advantages, including searching only for nursing and medical articles only. Besides, this system searches only for peer-reviewed articles, ensuring their quality. These features help to significantly improve the quality of the materials one is looking for, the overall work efficiency, and the effectiveness of the result.
References
Regalbuto, R., Maurer, M. S., Chapel, D., Mendez, J., & Shaffer, J. A. (2014). Joint Commission requirements for discharge instructions in patients with heart failure: Is understanding important for preventing readmissions? Journal of Cardiac Failure, 20(9), 641-649. Web.
Smith, T. (2009). Critical appraisal of quantitative and qualitative research literature. Radiographer, 56(3), 6-10. Web.
Vassallo, J. (2018). WASP (Write a Scientific Paper): Critical appraisal of existing research. Early human development, 127, 98-100. Web.