Seattle’s Team Read Program and Its Evaluation

McCaw, Susan, his wife, and John Stanford, a Seattle Schools Superintendent, developed the Team Read Program. They had a goal of finding better methods to improve the reading skills of students in elementary school. The purpose of the Team Read Program is to enhance literacy in Seattle Schools. It aims to increase elementary learners’ reading skills and competency through training by high school students for one year. Some of the evaluation questions related to the objectives of this initiative include; does the program promote reading skills and literacy? Does the scheme meet all its intended targets? Other questions pertain to the purpose of stakeholders in achieving goals and the collection of their concerns. For instance, what is the purpose of stakeholders in the success of this program? How are the needs of stakeholders advised and collected? Evaluation of the Team Read Initiative is essential in determining the success and concerns of employees.

Team Read Program is a private-public partnership where non-governmental dollars and energy collaborate to work in public schools to promote literacy and reading skills. Its committee comprises Seattle School District members, the community, and Alliance for Education initiative staff, Craig, an entrepreneur, and his wife, Susan (“Team Read (A),” 1999). The program’s creation was followed by choosing McKay, a manager, and Dore, and identifying four schools to participate in the initiative. One of the underlying issues the board members experienced related to the program was unacceptance in society. Educators and learning institution administrators were suspicious of the scheme due to previous encounters with other programs. McKay had to double her effort to acquire stakeholders such as teachers and elementary school members.

Evaluators will assess the program by utilizing the initiative’s data and various other methods to form the foundation of performance assessment. For instance, Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) are critical in understanding whether the plan is on the right track. Another assessment method will be benchmarking to compare the program’s practice against industry standards. Analysts will also apply surveying in assessing the progress due to a large number of stakeholders. Some of the appropriate measures to evaluate the program’s success include; interviews, observations, and administrative data. Interviews provide a direct engagement with workers and thus offer a significant amount of information about a given project (Kerzner, 2017). Compliance facilitates the first-hand gathering of data and does not rely on reported information. Some of the issues that might affect the evaluation include inadequate resources, lack of data trust, and the absence of an appropriate connection between change theory and information gathered. The absence of stakeholders’ voices might occur during surveys and interviews, and this situation is another challenge for evaluation.

The main stakeholders in Team Read Program are coaches, site coordinators, and volunteers. Coaches must be fluent in English and have higher grades in reading subjects (“Team Read (A),” 1999). Their main objectives include being available in all teaching sessions, focusing on reading exercises and practices, and following directions of higher individuals such as site coordinators who promote effective running of the program (“Team Read (A),” 1999). The stakeholders who have a clear stake in the program’s outcome are volunteers. They help the site coordinators in activities such as transportation logistics and coaching. Surveys and interviews are some of the ways evaluators will use to collect concerns of working staff. They provide a set of questions that respondents answer for the effective collection of data. The evaluation components such as benchmarking, KPIs, surveying, and interviews significantly consider the needs of stakeholders. They preserve the identity of members unless the members allow the evaluators to reveal it in any possible way.

In conclusion, an evaluation of the Team Read Program is essential to determine the progress and concerns of workers. Some of the methods that evaluators will use to assess the initiative include KPI, surveys, interviews, and benchmarking. Moreover, observation and use of administrative data are practical measurements of success. Surveys and interviews provide a set of questions to the stakeholders they will utilize for the reliable collection of data.


Kerzner, H. (2017). Project management metrics, KPIs, and dashboards: A guide to measuring and monitoring project performance. John Wiley & Sons.

Team Read (A): Improving Literacy in the Seattle School District. (1999). The electronic Hallway.

Cite this paper

Select style


ChalkyPapers. (2022, August 22). Seattle's Team Read Program and Its Evaluation. Retrieved from


ChalkyPapers. (2022, August 22). Seattle's Team Read Program and Its Evaluation.

Work Cited

"Seattle's Team Read Program and Its Evaluation." ChalkyPapers, 22 Aug. 2022,


ChalkyPapers. (2022) 'Seattle's Team Read Program and Its Evaluation'. 22 August.


ChalkyPapers. 2022. "Seattle's Team Read Program and Its Evaluation." August 22, 2022.

1. ChalkyPapers. "Seattle's Team Read Program and Its Evaluation." August 22, 2022.


ChalkyPapers. "Seattle's Team Read Program and Its Evaluation." August 22, 2022.